New Delhi: Mr Anbazhagan, in his plea, has sought stay on the appeal proceedings before the Karnataka High Court on the ground that they are vitiated as the special public prosecutor is no more authorised to represent the state.
The petition has sought removal of the special public prosecutor, raising questions about his impartiality as prosecutor in the case.
At the outset, the bench said, "it seems that the hearing (before the HC) is almost over. Suppose, the conviction is upheld then you cannot complain and if it is not upheld then you can re-agitate it. Therefore, wait for the judgement."
"This appeal stands vitiated. Whether appeal succeeds or fails is not an issue. The issue is that the special prosecutor has no authority to appear before the High Court as prosecutor," senior advocate T R Andhyarujina, appearing for Mr Anbazhagan, said.
He referred to the earlier apex court judgement in the case saying it was transferred to Karnataka from Tamil Nadu and it was made clear that the prosecutor would be appointed by the Karnataka government in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court.
Karnataka has already said that Bhawani Singh is no more the prosecutor and therefore, he has no "authority to appear in the appeal proceedings", he said, adding that his subsequent appointment by the Tamil Nadu government to appear as prosecutor in the case is against the Supreme Court judgement.
The bench then said it is a "legal" question which needs to be decided.
The Special court had held Ms Jayalalithaa and three others guilty of corruption. The court had also slapped a fine of Rs 100 crore on the AIADMK chief and Rs 10 crore fine on each of the three other convicts.
The Supreme Court today refused to stay the hearing before the Karnataka High Court on the appeal of former Tamil Nadu Chief Minister J Jayalalithaa against her conviction in the disproportionate assets case, saying that it would decide the plea of Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) leader K Anbazhagan seeking removal of the public prosecutor.
A bench headed by Justice Madan B Lokur issued notices to the AIADMK Chief and other convicts -- close aide Sasikala and two of her relatives, the Karnataka government and special public prosecutor Bhawani Singh on the plea of the DMK leader and fixed it for disposal on March 18.
The petition has sought removal of the special public prosecutor, raising questions about his impartiality as prosecutor in the case.
Advertisement
"This appeal stands vitiated. Whether appeal succeeds or fails is not an issue. The issue is that the special prosecutor has no authority to appear before the High Court as prosecutor," senior advocate T R Andhyarujina, appearing for Mr Anbazhagan, said.
Advertisement
Karnataka has already said that Bhawani Singh is no more the prosecutor and therefore, he has no "authority to appear in the appeal proceedings", he said, adding that his subsequent appointment by the Tamil Nadu government to appear as prosecutor in the case is against the Supreme Court judgement.
Advertisement
The Special court had held Ms Jayalalithaa and three others guilty of corruption. The court had also slapped a fine of Rs 100 crore on the AIADMK chief and Rs 10 crore fine on each of the three other convicts.
COMMENTS
Advertisement
"Unless It Defeats Ends Of Justice...": Supreme Court On Denying Bail To Juvenile J&K Poll Dates Going Past Top Court Deadline? Election Body Chief Responds From Early Laws To Arizona: How Abortion Laws Have Evolved In The US Over The Decades Parents Gave Names Of Interns, Doctors To CBI In Kolkata Horror: Sources Video: Woman Tries To Jump Off Mumbai's Atal Setu, Saved By Driver, Cops Private Jets, Luxury Cars: Lavish Life Of "Ketamine Queen" Jasveen Sangha Watch: Turkish MPs Fight During Debate On Jailed Opposition Leader "Shoot Me Up With...": What Matthew Perry Told Assistant Hours Before Death Private Jets, Luxury Cars: Lavish Life Of "Ketamine Queen" Jasveen Sangha Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.