Five Judge Constitution Bench
- All
- News
- Videos
-
People Can Have Different Opinion: Article 370 Judge On Landmark Verdict
- Friday December 29, 2023
- India News | NDTV News Desk
The unanimous judgment on Kashmir was the opinion of five judges and people can differ, Justice (Retd) SK Kaul, who was part of the constitution bench that delivered the verdict, told NDTV today.
- www.ndtv.com
-
Ayodhya Verdict: "Time For Healing, Big Relief...": Supreme Court Judge To NDTV On Ayodhya
- Saturday November 9, 2019
- India News | Edited by Deepshikha Ghosh
After delivering a historic verdict in the Ayodhya case, one of the five judges in the Supreme Court Constitution bench said "it is time for healing."
- www.ndtv.com
-
Ayodhya Verdict: Security Increased For 5 Supreme Court Judges Delivering Ayodhya Verdict
- Friday November 8, 2019
- India News | Edited by Vaibhav Tiwari
The security of the five judges of the Supreme Court's Constitution Bench has been increased to Z Plus in view of its judgment in the Ayodhya temple-mosque title suit, which will be announced on Saturday.
- www.ndtv.com
-
UP Minister's "Supreme Court Is Ours" Remark Criticised By Chief Justice
- Thursday September 12, 2019
- India News | Edited by Anindita Sanyal
Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi today condemned the claims of minister from Uttar Pradesh who claimed that the Ram temple the BJP promised in Ayodhya will be built, "since the Supreme Court is ours". "We deprecate such statements," said Chief Justice Gogoi, who is heading the five judge constitution bench that is hearing the case on title dispute on a ...
- www.ndtv.com
-
No Hearing In Ayodhya Case On Day 8 As Top Court Judge Is Unavailable
- Monday August 19, 2019
- India News | Press Trust of India
The hearing in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case could not take place in the Supreme Court on Monday due to unavailability of one of the five judges of the Constitution bench.
- www.ndtv.com
-
Will There Be Mediation In Ayodhya Case? Supreme Court Decision Shortly
- Friday March 8, 2019
- India News | Edited by Anindita Sanyal
A five judge constitution bench will decide today whether the Ram temple issue that has been pending in courts for 60 years, can be solved by mediation.
- www.ndtv.com
-
The Reason Behind Justice UU Lalit's Exit From Ayodhya Case
- Thursday January 10, 2019
- India News | Press Trust of India
The Ayodhya title dispute was deferred again today and posted to January 29 as one of the five judges in the constitution bench assigned the hear the case, Justice UU Lalit, dropped out. Justice Lalit recused himself because he had been a lawyer in a related case.
- www.ndtv.com
-
Ayodhya Hearing Deferred To January 29 After Top Court Judge Exits Case
- Thursday January 10, 2019
- India News | Written by Alok Pandey
The Ayodhya case in the Supreme Court was adjourned again today after the exit of one of the five judges in the constitution bench. Justice UU Lalit recused himself saying he had been a lawyer in a related case.
- www.ndtv.com
-
5 Judges To Rule On Polygamy, Why Only 3 For Ayodhya, Supreme Court Asked
- Saturday April 7, 2018
- India News | Reported by A Vaidyanathan, Edited by Aloke Tikku
A bench of five judges set up to decide if polygamy among Muslims is constitutionally valid was cited as a ground in the Supreme Court today to refer the Ayodhya land dispute to a larger bench. "Is the polygamy case more important than Ayodhya case? When polygamy can be referred to a Constitution bench, why not Ayodhya land dispute?" senior lawyer ...
- www.ndtv.com
-
Linking Aadhaar With Pension Should Not Be Mandatory, Says Supreme Court. 5 Points
- Friday March 23, 2018
- Business | NDTV Profit Team
The Supreme Court on Wednesday questioned the mandatory use of Aadhaar card for drawing pension by retired government employees, reported IANS. Aadhaar is a 12-digit personal identification number issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI)- as mentioned on the official website of UIDAI- uidai.gov.in. Supreme Court said that pens...
- www.ndtv.com/business
-
Free Choice Or State Decision: Kapil Sibal Sharpens Argument On Aadhaar In Supreme Court
- Tuesday February 13, 2018
- India News | Written by A Vaidyanathan
The legal challenge to the Aadhaar identification programme is the most important case ever heard by the Supreme Court, more important than the 1976 verdict in which the top court upheld suspension of fundamental rights during Emergency, senior lawyer Kapil Sibal told five judges of the Supreme Court today.
- www.ndtv.com
-
Supreme Court To Hear Petitions On Compulsory Aadhaar Linking Today: 10 Facts
- Thursday December 14, 2017
- India News | Edited by Aloke Tikku
Five judges of the Supreme Court will tomorrow start hearing a bunch of petitions that wants the court to stop the government from forcing people to link their Aadhaar number to access public services and benefits. The government had spelt out 31 December as the deadline for linking the 12-digit number to their bank accounts and other financial dea...
- www.ndtv.com
-
5 Supreme Court Judges To Revisit An Important Verdict On Reservation
- Wednesday November 15, 2017
- India News | Reported by A Vaidyanathan, Edited by Debanish Achom
Five judges of the Supreme Court will decide whether the most backward of castes -- scheduled caste and tribes (SC/ST), should be guaranteed a share of promotions in government jobs
- www.ndtv.com
-
Chief Justice's Actions Trigger Debate On Fairness, Transparency
- Saturday November 11, 2017
- India News | Reported by Sunetra Choudhury, Sunil Prabhu
In a sudden hearing on Friday, five judges of the Supreme Court headed by the Chief Justice of India said that he alone has the power to call a constitution bench because he is "master of the roster". In doing so, they cancelled an order passed on Thursday by the second-most senior judge of the top court, Justice J Chelameswar, who had already call...
- www.ndtv.com
-
Constitution Bench To Consider Probe In Ex-Judge Bribe Charge: 10 Facts
- Friday November 10, 2017
- India News | Edited by Divyanshu Dutta Roy
The Supreme Court on Thursday started hearing a petition to seek a special team to probe allegations of bribes to judges but later referred the case to a Constitution Bench comprising the court's five senior-most judges. The Constitution Bench will take up the case on Monday, November 13. The petition, filed by senior lawyer Kamini Jaiswal, is link...
- www.ndtv.com
-
People Can Have Different Opinion: Article 370 Judge On Landmark Verdict
- Friday December 29, 2023
- India News | NDTV News Desk
The unanimous judgment on Kashmir was the opinion of five judges and people can differ, Justice (Retd) SK Kaul, who was part of the constitution bench that delivered the verdict, told NDTV today.
- www.ndtv.com
-
Ayodhya Verdict: "Time For Healing, Big Relief...": Supreme Court Judge To NDTV On Ayodhya
- Saturday November 9, 2019
- India News | Edited by Deepshikha Ghosh
After delivering a historic verdict in the Ayodhya case, one of the five judges in the Supreme Court Constitution bench said "it is time for healing."
- www.ndtv.com
-
Ayodhya Verdict: Security Increased For 5 Supreme Court Judges Delivering Ayodhya Verdict
- Friday November 8, 2019
- India News | Edited by Vaibhav Tiwari
The security of the five judges of the Supreme Court's Constitution Bench has been increased to Z Plus in view of its judgment in the Ayodhya temple-mosque title suit, which will be announced on Saturday.
- www.ndtv.com
-
UP Minister's "Supreme Court Is Ours" Remark Criticised By Chief Justice
- Thursday September 12, 2019
- India News | Edited by Anindita Sanyal
Chief Justice Ranjan Gogoi today condemned the claims of minister from Uttar Pradesh who claimed that the Ram temple the BJP promised in Ayodhya will be built, "since the Supreme Court is ours". "We deprecate such statements," said Chief Justice Gogoi, who is heading the five judge constitution bench that is hearing the case on title dispute on a ...
- www.ndtv.com
-
No Hearing In Ayodhya Case On Day 8 As Top Court Judge Is Unavailable
- Monday August 19, 2019
- India News | Press Trust of India
The hearing in the Ram Janmabhoomi-Babri Masjid land dispute case could not take place in the Supreme Court on Monday due to unavailability of one of the five judges of the Constitution bench.
- www.ndtv.com
-
Will There Be Mediation In Ayodhya Case? Supreme Court Decision Shortly
- Friday March 8, 2019
- India News | Edited by Anindita Sanyal
A five judge constitution bench will decide today whether the Ram temple issue that has been pending in courts for 60 years, can be solved by mediation.
- www.ndtv.com
-
The Reason Behind Justice UU Lalit's Exit From Ayodhya Case
- Thursday January 10, 2019
- India News | Press Trust of India
The Ayodhya title dispute was deferred again today and posted to January 29 as one of the five judges in the constitution bench assigned the hear the case, Justice UU Lalit, dropped out. Justice Lalit recused himself because he had been a lawyer in a related case.
- www.ndtv.com
-
Ayodhya Hearing Deferred To January 29 After Top Court Judge Exits Case
- Thursday January 10, 2019
- India News | Written by Alok Pandey
The Ayodhya case in the Supreme Court was adjourned again today after the exit of one of the five judges in the constitution bench. Justice UU Lalit recused himself saying he had been a lawyer in a related case.
- www.ndtv.com
-
5 Judges To Rule On Polygamy, Why Only 3 For Ayodhya, Supreme Court Asked
- Saturday April 7, 2018
- India News | Reported by A Vaidyanathan, Edited by Aloke Tikku
A bench of five judges set up to decide if polygamy among Muslims is constitutionally valid was cited as a ground in the Supreme Court today to refer the Ayodhya land dispute to a larger bench. "Is the polygamy case more important than Ayodhya case? When polygamy can be referred to a Constitution bench, why not Ayodhya land dispute?" senior lawyer ...
- www.ndtv.com
-
Linking Aadhaar With Pension Should Not Be Mandatory, Says Supreme Court. 5 Points
- Friday March 23, 2018
- Business | NDTV Profit Team
The Supreme Court on Wednesday questioned the mandatory use of Aadhaar card for drawing pension by retired government employees, reported IANS. Aadhaar is a 12-digit personal identification number issued by the Unique Identification Authority of India (UIDAI)- as mentioned on the official website of UIDAI- uidai.gov.in. Supreme Court said that pens...
- www.ndtv.com/business
-
Free Choice Or State Decision: Kapil Sibal Sharpens Argument On Aadhaar In Supreme Court
- Tuesday February 13, 2018
- India News | Written by A Vaidyanathan
The legal challenge to the Aadhaar identification programme is the most important case ever heard by the Supreme Court, more important than the 1976 verdict in which the top court upheld suspension of fundamental rights during Emergency, senior lawyer Kapil Sibal told five judges of the Supreme Court today.
- www.ndtv.com
-
Supreme Court To Hear Petitions On Compulsory Aadhaar Linking Today: 10 Facts
- Thursday December 14, 2017
- India News | Edited by Aloke Tikku
Five judges of the Supreme Court will tomorrow start hearing a bunch of petitions that wants the court to stop the government from forcing people to link their Aadhaar number to access public services and benefits. The government had spelt out 31 December as the deadline for linking the 12-digit number to their bank accounts and other financial dea...
- www.ndtv.com
-
5 Supreme Court Judges To Revisit An Important Verdict On Reservation
- Wednesday November 15, 2017
- India News | Reported by A Vaidyanathan, Edited by Debanish Achom
Five judges of the Supreme Court will decide whether the most backward of castes -- scheduled caste and tribes (SC/ST), should be guaranteed a share of promotions in government jobs
- www.ndtv.com
-
Chief Justice's Actions Trigger Debate On Fairness, Transparency
- Saturday November 11, 2017
- India News | Reported by Sunetra Choudhury, Sunil Prabhu
In a sudden hearing on Friday, five judges of the Supreme Court headed by the Chief Justice of India said that he alone has the power to call a constitution bench because he is "master of the roster". In doing so, they cancelled an order passed on Thursday by the second-most senior judge of the top court, Justice J Chelameswar, who had already call...
- www.ndtv.com
-
Constitution Bench To Consider Probe In Ex-Judge Bribe Charge: 10 Facts
- Friday November 10, 2017
- India News | Edited by Divyanshu Dutta Roy
The Supreme Court on Thursday started hearing a petition to seek a special team to probe allegations of bribes to judges but later referred the case to a Constitution Bench comprising the court's five senior-most judges. The Constitution Bench will take up the case on Monday, November 13. The petition, filed by senior lawyer Kamini Jaiswal, is link...
- www.ndtv.com