Sc On Sabarimala

The Supreme Court is scheduled to frame issues for deliberation regarding discrimination against women in various religions and at religious places, including Kerala's Sabarimala temple, on Monday.

Political parties in Kerala on Thursday welcomed the Supreme Court decision to refer its September 28, 2018 order allowing women of all ages into the Lord Ayyappa temple in Sabarimala to a larger bench.

The Supreme Court today announcing its verdict on a review petition against its order on the Sabarimala temple case, referred the case to a larger seven-judge bench.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to stay its September order that had removed a ban on women of menstruating age from entering Sabarimala hill shrine in Kerala.

The Supreme Court today made it clear that fresh pleas related to the Sabarimala Temple will be heard only after it decides the earlier petitions seeking review of the judgment allowing entry of women of all age groups into the shrine in Kerala.

Should women of all ages be allowed to enter the famous Sabarimala shrine, where they had been banned for ages? The Supreme Court -- which was hearing a number of petitions challenging the debarment and calling it illegal -- has indicated that it would refer the matter to a five-judge constitution bench. But the order on what issues will be decided...

Amid the huge controversy over woman demanding their right to enter temples where they have been traditionally banned, the Supreme court today said restricting their entry to the sanctum sanctorum of Sabarimala temple, one of the holiest shrines of India, puts "gender justice in danger."

Kerala's Sabarimala temple's ban on women was questioned today by the Supreme Court, which said that Hindu scriptures Vedas and Upanishads do not discriminate between men and women.

The Supreme Court is scheduled to frame issues for deliberation regarding discrimination against women in various religions and at religious places, including Kerala's Sabarimala temple, on Monday.

Political parties in Kerala on Thursday welcomed the Supreme Court decision to refer its September 28, 2018 order allowing women of all ages into the Lord Ayyappa temple in Sabarimala to a larger bench.

The Supreme Court today announcing its verdict on a review petition against its order on the Sabarimala temple case, referred the case to a larger seven-judge bench.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday refused to stay its September order that had removed a ban on women of menstruating age from entering Sabarimala hill shrine in Kerala.

The Supreme Court today made it clear that fresh pleas related to the Sabarimala Temple will be heard only after it decides the earlier petitions seeking review of the judgment allowing entry of women of all age groups into the shrine in Kerala.

Should women of all ages be allowed to enter the famous Sabarimala shrine, where they had been banned for ages? The Supreme Court -- which was hearing a number of petitions challenging the debarment and calling it illegal -- has indicated that it would refer the matter to a five-judge constitution bench. But the order on what issues will be decided...

Amid the huge controversy over woman demanding their right to enter temples where they have been traditionally banned, the Supreme court today said restricting their entry to the sanctum sanctorum of Sabarimala temple, one of the holiest shrines of India, puts "gender justice in danger."

Kerala's Sabarimala temple's ban on women was questioned today by the Supreme Court, which said that Hindu scriptures Vedas and Upanishads do not discriminate between men and women.