File photo of Barack Obama.
Washington:
President Barack Obama will present the Iran nuclear debate as the most momentous US foreign policy decision since the Iraq war Wednesday, in a fresh bid to win support of the deal.
With the deal due to be voted on by a Republican-dominated Congress, Obama will address the American University in Washington in a bid to give historical weight to a polarizing and sometimes bitterly hyperbolic debate.
He will frame lawmakers' decision as "the most consequential" since a 2002 Congress backed George W. Bush's war with Iraq, according to a White House official.
Obama has long argued that the Iraq vote represented a grave mistake that pushed the United States into eight blood-soaked years of unnecessary conflict.
"He will point out that the same people who supported war in Iraq are opposing diplomacy with Iran, and that it would be an historic mistake to squander this opportunity," the official said.
Kennedy parallels
Positing the unpopular Iraq war as a cautionary tale, Obama is likely to recall president John F. Kennedy's diplomatic efforts to curb nuclear tests as a more worthy example to follow.
In a 1963 commencement address, Kennedy used the same university venue to vehemently argue for peace with the Soviet Union in the face of panic over a nuclear conflagration.
Speaking just months before his assassination, Kennedy cautioned against brandishing US power to bring about a the "peace of the grave or the security of the slave."
Instead, he announced diplomatic efforts to check "one of the greatest hazards which man faces in 1963, the further spread of nuclear arms."
Obama's diplomatic deal would give Iran sanctions relief in exchange for curbs on its nuclear program, which Washington long-believed was cover for building a bomb.
Obama has argued that the only alternative to negotiations with Iran is military action, something his critics angrily denounce as a false dichotomy.
The alternative to a bad deal, they say, is a better deal that not just subjects Iran to inspects and limits enrichment, but dismantles the nuclear program altogether.
The debate has split Congress largely -- although not exclusively -- along party lines, with Republicans, who are in the majority, staunchly against.
Obama will need to win the support of fellow Democrats in order to avoid having the deal struck down by lawmakers.
Here, history may prove as much a burden as an aid to Obama.
The United States and Iran severed ties following the 1979 Islamic Revolution which saw 52 American embassy staff and citizens held hostage for 444 days.
Iran's antagonism toward the United States, Israel and support for terror groups in the Middle East since then has given many lawmakers pause, with a number of Democrats already breaking ranks.
With the deal due to be voted on by a Republican-dominated Congress, Obama will address the American University in Washington in a bid to give historical weight to a polarizing and sometimes bitterly hyperbolic debate.
He will frame lawmakers' decision as "the most consequential" since a 2002 Congress backed George W. Bush's war with Iraq, according to a White House official.
Obama has long argued that the Iraq vote represented a grave mistake that pushed the United States into eight blood-soaked years of unnecessary conflict.
"He will point out that the same people who supported war in Iraq are opposing diplomacy with Iran, and that it would be an historic mistake to squander this opportunity," the official said.
Kennedy parallels
Positing the unpopular Iraq war as a cautionary tale, Obama is likely to recall president John F. Kennedy's diplomatic efforts to curb nuclear tests as a more worthy example to follow.
In a 1963 commencement address, Kennedy used the same university venue to vehemently argue for peace with the Soviet Union in the face of panic over a nuclear conflagration.
Speaking just months before his assassination, Kennedy cautioned against brandishing US power to bring about a the "peace of the grave or the security of the slave."
Instead, he announced diplomatic efforts to check "one of the greatest hazards which man faces in 1963, the further spread of nuclear arms."
Obama's diplomatic deal would give Iran sanctions relief in exchange for curbs on its nuclear program, which Washington long-believed was cover for building a bomb.
Obama has argued that the only alternative to negotiations with Iran is military action, something his critics angrily denounce as a false dichotomy.
The alternative to a bad deal, they say, is a better deal that not just subjects Iran to inspects and limits enrichment, but dismantles the nuclear program altogether.
The debate has split Congress largely -- although not exclusively -- along party lines, with Republicans, who are in the majority, staunchly against.
Obama will need to win the support of fellow Democrats in order to avoid having the deal struck down by lawmakers.
Here, history may prove as much a burden as an aid to Obama.
The United States and Iran severed ties following the 1979 Islamic Revolution which saw 52 American embassy staff and citizens held hostage for 444 days.
Iran's antagonism toward the United States, Israel and support for terror groups in the Middle East since then has given many lawmakers pause, with a number of Democrats already breaking ranks.
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world
