London: Britain's foreign minister Boris Johnson was accused by cabinet colleagues on Sunday of "backseat driving" on Brexit after setting out his own vision of the country's future outside the European Union.
Only days before Prime Minister Theresa May is due to speak in Italy about Britain's planned EU departure, Mr Johnson on Saturday published a 4,300-word newspaper article that roamed well beyond his ministerial brief and, in some cases, the approach set out by the government.
Interior minister Amber Rudd said it was "absolutely fine" for the foreign secretary to intervene publicly but that she did not want him managing the Brexit process.
"What we've got is Theresa May managing that process, she's driving the car," Rudd told the BBC's Andrew Marr on Sunday.
Asked if Mr Johnson was backseat driving, she replied: "Yes, you could call it backseat driving, absolutely."
Mr Johnson's article re-ignited speculation that he would challenge Prime Minister May for the leadership of the Conservative Party.
Ms Rudd, however, said she did not think Mr Johnson was laying the groundwork to challenge Prime Minister May.
"I think that he, like I, supports the prime minister at this difficult time as we try to conclude the negotiations with the EU," she said.
Prime Minister May's deputy, Damian Green, also weighed in, saying that Mr Johnson had written a "very exuberant" article but it was "absolutely clear to everyone that the driver of the car in this instance is the prime minister".
"It is the job of the rest of us in the cabinet to agree on a set of proposals and get behind those proposals and get behind the prime minister," Green told BBC TV.
MISUSE OF STATISTICS
Mr Johnson wrote in the Daily Telegraph that Britain would not pay to access the EU market in the future. Once out of the EU, the country should borrow to invest in infrastructure, reform the tax code and set immigration levels as it sees fit, he said.
Mr Johnson also repeated the Brexit campaign claim that the government would be 350 million pounds ($476 million) a week better off outside the EU.
Government officials criticised Mr Johnson for repeating the claim, saying the figure does not take into account the funding Britain receives back from Brussels.
David Norgrove, of the UK Statistics Authority, said he was "surprised and disappointed" that Mr Johnson was still quoting a figure that confused gross and net contributions.
"It is a clear misuse of official statistics," Mr Norgrove said in a letter to Mr Johnson on Sunday.
Mr Johnson said in reply that Mr Norgrove's letter was "based on what appeared to be a wilful distortion of the text of my article" and asked the official to withdraw it.
The timing of Johnson's article -- published a day after a bomb injured 30 people on a train in London -- also drew criticism from some colleagues.
Reacting to the furore his article had generated, Mr Johnson tweeted on Saturday: "Looking forward to PM's Florence Speech. All behind Theresa for a glorious Brexit."
Only days before Prime Minister Theresa May is due to speak in Italy about Britain's planned EU departure, Mr Johnson on Saturday published a 4,300-word newspaper article that roamed well beyond his ministerial brief and, in some cases, the approach set out by the government.
Interior minister Amber Rudd said it was "absolutely fine" for the foreign secretary to intervene publicly but that she did not want him managing the Brexit process.
Asked if Mr Johnson was backseat driving, she replied: "Yes, you could call it backseat driving, absolutely."
Advertisement
Ms Rudd, however, said she did not think Mr Johnson was laying the groundwork to challenge Prime Minister May.
Advertisement
Prime Minister May's deputy, Damian Green, also weighed in, saying that Mr Johnson had written a "very exuberant" article but it was "absolutely clear to everyone that the driver of the car in this instance is the prime minister".
Advertisement
MISUSE OF STATISTICS
Advertisement
Mr Johnson also repeated the Brexit campaign claim that the government would be 350 million pounds ($476 million) a week better off outside the EU.
Advertisement
David Norgrove, of the UK Statistics Authority, said he was "surprised and disappointed" that Mr Johnson was still quoting a figure that confused gross and net contributions.
"It is a clear misuse of official statistics," Mr Norgrove said in a letter to Mr Johnson on Sunday.
Mr Johnson said in reply that Mr Norgrove's letter was "based on what appeared to be a wilful distortion of the text of my article" and asked the official to withdraw it.
The timing of Johnson's article -- published a day after a bomb injured 30 people on a train in London -- also drew criticism from some colleagues.
Reacting to the furore his article had generated, Mr Johnson tweeted on Saturday: "Looking forward to PM's Florence Speech. All behind Theresa for a glorious Brexit."
© Thomson Reuters 2017
COMMENTS
Advertisement
UK Political Crisis: Why The Country Has Seen 3 Prime Ministers In 3 Years Nigel Farage: Brexit Firebrand Who Announced Eighth Bid To Become UK MP In Blow To Rishi Sunak, Brexit Champion Nigel Farage Announces UK Election Candidacy Barack Obama Wants Joe Biden To Pull Out Of US Presidential Race: Report World's Largest Isolated Tribe Makes Rare Appearance In New Footage Why BJP Lost Lok Sabha Polls In Uttar Pradesh - 6 Reasons In Party Report Comedy Legend Bob Newhart Dead At 94: Publicist Israeli Strike Kills Field Commander In Elite Hezbollah Unit: Report Delhi-San Francisco Air India Flight Diverted To Russia After Engine Glitch Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.