From low-quality computer-written books flooding the market to potential copyright violations, publishing is the latest industry to feel the threat from rapid developments in artificial intelligence.
Since the launch last year of ChatGPT, an easy-to-use AI chatbot that can deliver an essay upon request within seconds, there have been growing worries about the impact of generative AI on a range of sectors.
Among book industry players there is "a deep sense of insecurity", said Juergen Boos, director of the Frankfurt Book Fair, the world's biggest, where the topic was in focus last week.
They are asking "what happens to authors' intellectual property? Who does new content actually belong to? How do we bring this into value chains?" he said.
The threat is plain to see -- AI writing programs allow budding authors to produce in a matter of day novels that could in the past have taken months or years to write.
A flood of titles that list ChatGPT as a co-author have been offered for sale through Amazon's e-book self-publishing unit.
Still, critics say the works are of low quality and sense little threat from AI for now.
British author Salman Rushdie told a press conference at the fair that recently someone asked an AI writing tool to produce 300 words in his style.
"And what came out was pure garbage," said the "Midnight's Children" writer, to laughter from the audience.
"Anybody who has ever read 300 words of mine would immediately recognise that it could not possibly be by me."
"So far I'm not that alarmed," he added, during a rare public appearance since a near-fatal stabbing attack last year in the United States.
'Still not great'
Jennifer Becker, a German author and academic, echoed his sentiments, telling a panel discussion that the results when it comes to AI writing fiction "are still not that great".
"There is a lot of potential to use it -- to use it collaboratively.
"But I still don't see the point where we really hand over the writing work to AI completely autonomously. That wouldn't make for an interesting book."
Industry players stress however that in some areas there is more openness to dealing with artificial intelligence.
"It depends a bit on the genre," said Susanne Barwick, deputy legal adviser of the German Publishers and Booksellers Association, who has been in discussion about AI with publishers.
"The field of science and specialist books is already further along and has already dealt with it more."
These areas were "easier than the field of fiction, where I think at the moment people still tend to look a bit more at the risks", she added.
Artificial intelligence's relationship with publishing threatens to throw up a host of legal problems, with one major "grey area" being who owns copyright of AI-generated content, said fair director Boos.
"Then you get into a real mess, and it is a huge theme. There is also really a lot of money involved," he said.
Legal clashes
There are already AI-related legal clashes involving top writers.
Last month, "Game of Thrones" author George RR Martin, John Grisham and Jodi Picoult were among several writers who filed a class-action lawsuit against ChatGPT creator OpenAI over alleged violation of copyrights.
Along with the Authors Guild, an organisation representing writers, they accused the California-based company of using their books "without permission" to train ChatGPT's "large language models", algorithms capable of producing human-sounding text responses based on simple queries, according to the lawsuit.
Translation is another thorny area, with some industry players feeling artificial intelligence would miss the nuances and subtleties needed to render complex literature into other languages.
Efforts are being made to make it clearer when AI has been involved in producing a book.
Amazon recently released new guidelines that require authors who want to sell books through its self-publishing unit to tell the company in advance if their work includes material generated using artificial intelligence.
And some recognise the opportunities when it comes to AI and writing -- for example, in producing stereotypical romance novels.
This, Boos joked, could bring "some relief" that "people don't have to deal with that kind of content any more, and it can simply be generated at home on the computer".
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
