More than twice as many gun owners said they would be willing to purchase a childproof gun than would be unwilling. (Representational Image)
WASHINGTON:
Nearly 60 per cent of Americans are willing to purchase a childproof gun that is only operable in the hands of an authorised user, a new survey suggests, debunking the widely used argument by the gun lobby that there is no market for 'smart' weapons.
In addition to high overall support, the survey found that four in 10 gun owners and 56 per cent of political conservatives surveyed are willing to purchase a smart gun, researchers said.
The findings of the research, led by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, are consistent with the growing national interest in using technology to reduce the toll of gun deaths in the US.
The findings contrast sharply from earlier estimates. Research from 2013, funded by the gun manufacturers' trade association, suggested just 14 per cent of people would be willing to make their next handgun purchase a smart gun.
Proponents of smart guns say their widespread use would cut down on suicides, stolen or borrowed guns that go on to be used in crimes and accidental shootings by children.
The technology uses fingerprint or radio frequency identification (RFID) that only allows authorised people to fire a given handgun.
Objections from gun manufacturers and the gun lobby - including opposition to any requirements mandating the sale of smart over traditional guns - have kept them from being produced on a large scale, researchers said. Smart guns are not currently sold in the US.
"This has been one of the biggest arguments against smart guns, that people just don't want them. This research shows otherwise," said Julia A Wolfson, a PhD candidate in the Department of Health Policy and Management.
To examine public interest in purchasing smart guns, also known as childproof or personalised guns, the study team conducted a nationally representative, web-based survey in January 2015, getting responses from 3,949 people.
The respondents were nearly evenly split among gun owners and those who do not own guns. About 59 per cent respondents said they would be willing to consider a childproof gun if they were to purchase a new weapon.
More than twice as many gun owners said they would be willing to purchase a childproof gun than would be unwilling. The guns were most supported by political liberals (71 per cent), but support was also high among political moderates (56 per cent) and conservatives (56 per cent).
The technology to make guns smart is already being used in other products. Some smartphones can be unlocked by the user's unique thumbprint.
Many cars use RFID to allow for keyless entry and keyless ignitions.
For a smart gun, a chip could be embedded in a watch or a ring worn by the authorised user; the gun would then verify the identity of the person holding it as an authorised user and could fire.
The study was published in the American Journal of Public Health.
In addition to high overall support, the survey found that four in 10 gun owners and 56 per cent of political conservatives surveyed are willing to purchase a smart gun, researchers said.
The findings of the research, led by the Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, are consistent with the growing national interest in using technology to reduce the toll of gun deaths in the US.
The findings contrast sharply from earlier estimates. Research from 2013, funded by the gun manufacturers' trade association, suggested just 14 per cent of people would be willing to make their next handgun purchase a smart gun.
Proponents of smart guns say their widespread use would cut down on suicides, stolen or borrowed guns that go on to be used in crimes and accidental shootings by children.
The technology uses fingerprint or radio frequency identification (RFID) that only allows authorised people to fire a given handgun.
Objections from gun manufacturers and the gun lobby - including opposition to any requirements mandating the sale of smart over traditional guns - have kept them from being produced on a large scale, researchers said. Smart guns are not currently sold in the US.
"This has been one of the biggest arguments against smart guns, that people just don't want them. This research shows otherwise," said Julia A Wolfson, a PhD candidate in the Department of Health Policy and Management.
To examine public interest in purchasing smart guns, also known as childproof or personalised guns, the study team conducted a nationally representative, web-based survey in January 2015, getting responses from 3,949 people.
The respondents were nearly evenly split among gun owners and those who do not own guns. About 59 per cent respondents said they would be willing to consider a childproof gun if they were to purchase a new weapon.
More than twice as many gun owners said they would be willing to purchase a childproof gun than would be unwilling. The guns were most supported by political liberals (71 per cent), but support was also high among political moderates (56 per cent) and conservatives (56 per cent).
The technology to make guns smart is already being used in other products. Some smartphones can be unlocked by the user's unique thumbprint.
Many cars use RFID to allow for keyless entry and keyless ignitions.
For a smart gun, a chip could be embedded in a watch or a ring worn by the authorised user; the gun would then verify the identity of the person holding it as an authorised user and could fire.
The study was published in the American Journal of Public Health.
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world
