Baghdad:
The top American military commander in Iraq said on Wednesday that UN peacekeeping forces may need to protect disputed territories in the nation's north if tensions between Kurds and Arabs haven't eased by the time US troops leave in 2011.
In an interview with The Associated Press, US Army Gen. Ray Odierno said UN peacekeepers might be one option if Kurdish soldiers haven't integrated into the Arab-dominated Iraqi army over the next year. He said he hopes the UN forces won't be necessary.
But Odierno acknowledged that tensions between the two cultures and the oil-rich land in Iraq's north that each side claims as its territory, have been simmering for years without resolution. Iraq's Kurds want several areas of Ninevah, Tamim and Diyala provinces to be part of their autonomous region, a move opposed by the Arab-dominated central government.
"If they have not integrated, we might have to think of some other mechanism," Odierno said.
"I don't know what that is it yet. Is it a Chapter 6 UN force? I don't know. But that's something
that has to be worked out, and it'll be depending on how far we are able to bring this process."
Chapter 6 of the United Nations charter refers to peace-keeping duties like investigating and mediating disputes. Odierno said that if Kurdish troops are working well within the Iraqi army, "then we'll let them do it. It's too early to tell. But that's an issue that we'll have to watch and work through."
The prospect of UN peacekeepers raises questions about whether Iraq will be stable by the time all US troops are required to leave at the end of 2011 under a security agreement between Washington and Baghdad.
It's widely believed that Iraq's leaders may ask the United States to revisit that agreement and leave at least some troops behind after 2011 to give the nation's uneven army and police forces more time to train. Odierno maintained that decision would be up to the incoming Iraqi government, whose leadership is still being negotiated after no clear winner emerged from the March parliamentary elections. But he left open the door that some US troops might stay.
"I don't see a large US presence here. I really don't," he said. "They might want technical support, but again, that's their decision, not ours." The United Nations would need to approve a resolution before sending peace-keeping troops to Iraq, and doing so would significantly change its political mission. The current UN mission in Iraq does not include support for peace-keepers.
In an interview with The Associated Press, US Army Gen. Ray Odierno said UN peacekeepers might be one option if Kurdish soldiers haven't integrated into the Arab-dominated Iraqi army over the next year. He said he hopes the UN forces won't be necessary.
But Odierno acknowledged that tensions between the two cultures and the oil-rich land in Iraq's north that each side claims as its territory, have been simmering for years without resolution. Iraq's Kurds want several areas of Ninevah, Tamim and Diyala provinces to be part of their autonomous region, a move opposed by the Arab-dominated central government.
"If they have not integrated, we might have to think of some other mechanism," Odierno said.
"I don't know what that is it yet. Is it a Chapter 6 UN force? I don't know. But that's something
that has to be worked out, and it'll be depending on how far we are able to bring this process."
Chapter 6 of the United Nations charter refers to peace-keeping duties like investigating and mediating disputes. Odierno said that if Kurdish troops are working well within the Iraqi army, "then we'll let them do it. It's too early to tell. But that's an issue that we'll have to watch and work through."
The prospect of UN peacekeepers raises questions about whether Iraq will be stable by the time all US troops are required to leave at the end of 2011 under a security agreement between Washington and Baghdad.
It's widely believed that Iraq's leaders may ask the United States to revisit that agreement and leave at least some troops behind after 2011 to give the nation's uneven army and police forces more time to train. Odierno maintained that decision would be up to the incoming Iraqi government, whose leadership is still being negotiated after no clear winner emerged from the March parliamentary elections. But he left open the door that some US troops might stay.
"I don't see a large US presence here. I really don't," he said. "They might want technical support, but again, that's their decision, not ours." The United Nations would need to approve a resolution before sending peace-keeping troops to Iraq, and doing so would significantly change its political mission. The current UN mission in Iraq does not include support for peace-keepers.
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world
