Advertisement
This Article is From Apr 08, 2024

Pak Man To Get 80 Lashes For Falsely Accusing Ex-Wife Of Adultery: Report

The court ruled that after the conviction, his evidence shall not be admissible in any court of law following the confirmation of the conviction from the Federal Shariat Court.

Pak Man To Get 80 Lashes For Falsely Accusing Ex-Wife Of Adultery: Report
The ex-husband failed to provide maintenance or take her back to his home (Representational)
Karachi:

In a rare punishment, a Pakistani court has sentenced a man in Sindh province to 80 lashes for refusing to admit the paternity of his child and falsely accusing his ex-wife of adultery.

Additional District and Sessions Judge (Malir) Shehnaz Bohyo convicted Fareed Qadir under Section 7(1) of the Offence of Qazf (Enforcement Of Hadd) Ordinance, 1979 for disowning his legal child and making false accusations against his ex-wife, Dawn News reported on Monday.

The section of the ordinance reads: "Whoever commits qazf liable to hadd shall be punished with whipping numbering eighty stripes." "It is crystal clear that the accused is a liar and had fabricated an allegation of Qazf upon the complainant regarding illegitimacy of her daughter... Thus, he is convicted and sentenced to 80 stripes each under section 7(1) of the Qazf Ordinance, 1979," the order said.

The court ruled that after the conviction, his evidence shall not be admissible in any court of law following the confirmation of the conviction from the Federal Shariat Court.

"As the accused is sentenced to whipping only... he shall remain on bail, provided that he agrees to appear at the time and place designated by this court for the execution of the punishment of whipping, following the confirmation of the conviction and sentence by the court of appeal, and submits a bail bond for Rs 100,000," the verdict said.

The convict's ex-wife, who got married in February 2015, said they happily lived together for one month and in December 2015 gave birth to a baby girl.

However, her ex-husband failed to provide maintenance or take her back to his home.

When she moved to a family court the judge ruled in her favour and directed the convict to provide maintenance for his daughter and former wife.

However, the husband submitted two applications in court during the proceedings of the execution application, requesting a DNA test for the baby girl and disowning his daughter. These applications were subsequently withdrawn by him.

However, the complainant filed an application seeking legal remedy against her ex-husband for levelling serious allegations against her.

During the trial, the accused denied allegations regarding his ex-wife and said she had only lived with him for six hours after their marriage and then left the home to never return.

However, the court noted that the accused neither testified under oath nor produced any witnesses to support his claims, adding that the defence also failed to bring any evidence regarding the accused making an apology or filing applications over a misunderstanding.

The court said the accused in his recorded statement under Section 342 of the CrPC admitted that a baby girl was his legitimate daughter.

Prosecutor Saira Bano said she did not witness any convictions of flogging under Section 7 of the Qafz Ordinance during her 14 years of service as a lawyer.

She explained the implementation of the punishment of 80 lashes is subject to confirmation or otherwise by the court of appeal.

She believed that the recent conviction could be the first instance of corporal punishment in many decades.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world

Follow us:
Listen to the latest songs, only on JioSaavn.com