United States Army General John Campbell. (Reuters Photo)
Washington:
The United States military took responsibility on Tuesday for a deadly air strike on a hospital in the Afghan city of Kunduz, calling it a mistake and vowing to hold people accountable.
Saturday's strike on an Afghan hospital run by Doctors Without Borders, or Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF), killed 22 people and deeply angered the medical charity. MSF officials have blamed the United States, demanding an independent investigation into an attack it called a war crime.
Defence Secretary Ash Carter said the Pentagon "deeply regrets" the loss of life.
"The United States military takes the greatest care in our operations to prevent the loss of innocent life, and when we make mistakes, we own up to them.
That's exactly what we're doing right now," Carter, who was travelling in Europe, said in a statement.
"We will do everything we can to understand this tragic incident, learn from it, and hold people accountable as necessary," he said.
Earlier in Washington, the American commander of international forces in Afghanistan, Army General John Campbell, called the strike a mistake made within the United States chain of command.
The comments by Ash Carter and John Campbell were the most direct acknowledgement yet by the United States government that the strike on the hospital was carried out by United States forces.
On Monday, Campbell said only that United States forces had responded to a request for support from Afghan forces.
In testmimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee, John Campbell also made clear he favoured a rethink of a plan to withdraw almost all United States troops by the end of next year.
He said rising threats in Afghanistan from the Islamic State and al Qaeda were among factors informing his recommendations to the White House on future troop levels.
John Campbell said United States forces had responded to a request from Afghan forces and provided close air support as they engaged in a fight with Taliban militants in Kunduz, a provincial capital that the Taliban captured late last month.
"To be clear, the decision to provide aerial fires was a United States decision made within the United States chain of command," John Campbell said.
He added that United States special forces nearby were communicating with the aircraft that delivered the strikes.
"A hospital was mistakenly struck," John Campbell said. "We would never intentionally target a protected medical facility."
President Barack Obama expected steps to be taken to prevent such an incident from recurring, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said on Tuesday.
The government of President Ashraf Ghani, heavily dependent on Washington for military support and far less critical of the United States than his predecessor Hamid Karzai, has held back from directly criticizing the United States.
But an Afghan military officer took issue with the idea that Afghan forces had called for a strike against the hospital.
Abdullah Guard, commander of Afghan special forces in Kunduz, said his men had been under heavy fire in the area near the hospital, fighting a Taliban force estimated at around 500 men.
"It is possible our forces might have called for an air strike to hit the enemy position, but that doesn't mean to go and bomb the hospital," he told Reuters.
He was speaking before John Campbell's testimony on Tuesday, in which the American general made clear the decision to conduct the strike was a United States one.
John Campbell said on Tuesday he had directed forces under his command to undergo training to review operational authorities and rules of engagement to prevent further incidents like Kunduz.
RENEWED ATTENTION ON MISSION
The incident, along with the Taliban's capture of Kunduz, has cast renewed attention on the 14-year United States mission in Afghanistan.
Many members of Congress are deeply concerned about Barack Obama's plans for a final withdrawal of United States forces.
The president is reassessing the timetable for a drawdown that currently envisages removing all but about 1,000 U.S. soldiers by the end of 2016.
"The world walked away from Afghanistan once before and it descended into chaos that contributed to the worst terrorist attack ever against our homeland," said Senator John McCain, the Republican chairman of the armed services committee, referring to the September 11, 2001, attacks that were planned by al Qaeda militants sheltered by the then-ruling Taliban in Afghanistan.
"We cannot afford to repeat that mistake," John McCain said.
Campbell said counterterrorism missions would be less effective if the United States presence in Afghanistan was limited to a small force based in the capital.
He said there were some 1,000-3,000 Islamic State members in Afghanistan, although many of them were disaffected Taliban members who were "rebranding" themselves.
He declined to provide specifics about recommendations he had made to the White House about force levels, but said they included an option for more troops than just a small embassy-based force.
There are currently around 9,800 American troops in Afghanistan.
When asked by Senator Angus King whether his judgment was that conditions in Afghanistan would require revision of the withdrawal plan, Campbell responded: "Yes, sir."
Saturday's strike on an Afghan hospital run by Doctors Without Borders, or Medecins Sans Frontieres (MSF), killed 22 people and deeply angered the medical charity. MSF officials have blamed the United States, demanding an independent investigation into an attack it called a war crime.
Defence Secretary Ash Carter said the Pentagon "deeply regrets" the loss of life.
"The United States military takes the greatest care in our operations to prevent the loss of innocent life, and when we make mistakes, we own up to them.
That's exactly what we're doing right now," Carter, who was travelling in Europe, said in a statement.
"We will do everything we can to understand this tragic incident, learn from it, and hold people accountable as necessary," he said.
Earlier in Washington, the American commander of international forces in Afghanistan, Army General John Campbell, called the strike a mistake made within the United States chain of command.
The comments by Ash Carter and John Campbell were the most direct acknowledgement yet by the United States government that the strike on the hospital was carried out by United States forces.
On Monday, Campbell said only that United States forces had responded to a request for support from Afghan forces.
In testmimony to the Senate Armed Services Committee, John Campbell also made clear he favoured a rethink of a plan to withdraw almost all United States troops by the end of next year.
He said rising threats in Afghanistan from the Islamic State and al Qaeda were among factors informing his recommendations to the White House on future troop levels.
John Campbell said United States forces had responded to a request from Afghan forces and provided close air support as they engaged in a fight with Taliban militants in Kunduz, a provincial capital that the Taliban captured late last month.
"To be clear, the decision to provide aerial fires was a United States decision made within the United States chain of command," John Campbell said.
He added that United States special forces nearby were communicating with the aircraft that delivered the strikes.
"A hospital was mistakenly struck," John Campbell said. "We would never intentionally target a protected medical facility."
President Barack Obama expected steps to be taken to prevent such an incident from recurring, White House spokesman Josh Earnest said on Tuesday.
The government of President Ashraf Ghani, heavily dependent on Washington for military support and far less critical of the United States than his predecessor Hamid Karzai, has held back from directly criticizing the United States.
But an Afghan military officer took issue with the idea that Afghan forces had called for a strike against the hospital.
Abdullah Guard, commander of Afghan special forces in Kunduz, said his men had been under heavy fire in the area near the hospital, fighting a Taliban force estimated at around 500 men.
"It is possible our forces might have called for an air strike to hit the enemy position, but that doesn't mean to go and bomb the hospital," he told Reuters.
He was speaking before John Campbell's testimony on Tuesday, in which the American general made clear the decision to conduct the strike was a United States one.
John Campbell said on Tuesday he had directed forces under his command to undergo training to review operational authorities and rules of engagement to prevent further incidents like Kunduz.
RENEWED ATTENTION ON MISSION
The incident, along with the Taliban's capture of Kunduz, has cast renewed attention on the 14-year United States mission in Afghanistan.
Many members of Congress are deeply concerned about Barack Obama's plans for a final withdrawal of United States forces.
The president is reassessing the timetable for a drawdown that currently envisages removing all but about 1,000 U.S. soldiers by the end of 2016.
"The world walked away from Afghanistan once before and it descended into chaos that contributed to the worst terrorist attack ever against our homeland," said Senator John McCain, the Republican chairman of the armed services committee, referring to the September 11, 2001, attacks that were planned by al Qaeda militants sheltered by the then-ruling Taliban in Afghanistan.
"We cannot afford to repeat that mistake," John McCain said.
Campbell said counterterrorism missions would be less effective if the United States presence in Afghanistan was limited to a small force based in the capital.
He said there were some 1,000-3,000 Islamic State members in Afghanistan, although many of them were disaffected Taliban members who were "rebranding" themselves.
He declined to provide specifics about recommendations he had made to the White House about force levels, but said they included an option for more troops than just a small embassy-based force.
There are currently around 9,800 American troops in Afghanistan.
When asked by Senator Angus King whether his judgment was that conditions in Afghanistan would require revision of the withdrawal plan, Campbell responded: "Yes, sir."
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world
