Probe: Bad judgment in military school Islam class

Washington: Poor judgment and poor oversight led to the teaching of anti-Islamic material at a US military school for officers, according to a Defense Department report on Wednesday.

Though an Army lieutenant colonel who taught the class has been relieved of his teaching duties, investigators recommended reviewing the actions of two civilian officials at the school to see if they also should face discipline, the Defense Department said in a statement.

Materials in a course for military officers at Joint Forces Staff College in Norfolk, Virginia, portrayed the US as at war with Islam.

That's an idea counter to repeated assertions by US officials that the enemy is terrorists.

Some of the material suggested the US ultimately might have to obliterate the Islamic holy cities of Mecca and Medina without regard for civilian deaths, following World War II precedents of the nuclear attack on Hiroshima, Japan, or the allied firebombing of Dresden, Germany.

Advertisement

The teacher, Lt Col Matthew Dooley, also taught that the Geneva Convention, which guides behavior toward prisoners, was "no longer relevant" and instructed officers that Muslims "hate everything you stand for."

The Pentagon suspended the course in late April when a student objected to the material. The FBI also changed some agent training last year after discovering that its curriculum, too, was critical of Islam.

Advertisement

The report comes from the office of chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, Gen Martin Dempsey, who had ordered all service branches to review their training to ensure that other courses do not use anti-Islamic material and that procedures are in place to screen course content.

The two-part review found that such issues with approving curricula, presentations and guest lecturers only existed at Joint Forces Staff College, said a statement from Dempsey's spokesman, Marine Col Dave Lapan.

Advertisement

The inquiry into the Norfolk elective course, called "Perspectives on Islam and Islamic Radicalism," found there were "institutional failures in oversight and judgment" that allowed the course to be modified over time in a way that left out instruction on US counterterrorism strategy and policy.

Somewhere along the line, it adopted "a teaching methodology that portrayed Islam almost entirely in a negative way," Lapan said.