File photo: Julian Assange
Stockholme:
A Swedish court was set to rule Wednesday if an arrest warrant against WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange for alleged sexual assault should be dropped.
A decision to cancel the warrant would be a step towards enabling the 43-year-old Australian to walk out of the Ecuadoran embassy in London, where he has been holed up for the past two years in a bid to avoid extradition to Sweden.
The hearing was held partly behind closed doors and the Stockholm court was expected to announce a decision at about 1600 GMT.
Prosecutors demanded that the warrant should be upheld, Swedish news agency TT reported.
But Mr Assange's lawyer Thomas Olsson said it should be repealed with "immediate effect," TT said, adding that the proceedings continued behind closed doors.
The warrant was issued in late 2010 over allegations of rape and sexual molestation, claims Mr Assange has denied.
Mr Assange sought refuge in Ecuador's embassy in Britain in June 2012 after having exhausted all legal options at British courts to avoid being extradited to Sweden.
He has said he fears that being sent to Sweden would be a pretext for transferring him to the United States, where WikiLeaks sparked an uproar with its publication of thousands of secret documents.
WikiLeaks repeatedly drove the global news agenda with startling revelations of the behind-the-scenes activities of governments around the world.
From confidential assessments by US diplomats of Chinese leaders to revised body counts in Iraq, the WikiLeaks documents provided the public with an unprecedented look under the hood of international politics.
- 'Strong arguments' -
Mr Assange's legal team has argued that Swedish prosecutors have dragged out the case for an unreasonably long period by not interviewing him at the embassy.
"We are confident about the hearing," Mr Assange's lawyer Mr Olsson told AFP Tuesday. "We think we have very strong arguments for the court to overrule the original decision."
Camilla Murray, chief administrator at the court, said a decision in favour of Mr Assange would mean that a European arrest warrant against him will be immediately cancelled.
"The charges will not be dropped just because the court cancels the arrest warrant. But I cannot answer for the prosecutors and what they will do. They are the ones leading the investigation," she told AFP.
Mr Assange has acknowledged that even if the Swedish prosecutors decide to drop the case, it is only one part of the legal battle that keeps him marooned at the embassy.
"I still have the larger problem, which is that of the United States and its pending prosecution, and perhaps extradition warrant," he told reporters in a conference call in June.
Mr Olsson, his lawyer, was also cautious about stating what will happen if the court repeals the warrant.
"What he will do when that occurs is up to Julian Assange. We're going to have a hearing... and we hope to get a decision overruling (the warrant) and then we will take it from there."
A decision to cancel the warrant would be a step towards enabling the 43-year-old Australian to walk out of the Ecuadoran embassy in London, where he has been holed up for the past two years in a bid to avoid extradition to Sweden.
The hearing was held partly behind closed doors and the Stockholm court was expected to announce a decision at about 1600 GMT.
Prosecutors demanded that the warrant should be upheld, Swedish news agency TT reported.
But Mr Assange's lawyer Thomas Olsson said it should be repealed with "immediate effect," TT said, adding that the proceedings continued behind closed doors.
The warrant was issued in late 2010 over allegations of rape and sexual molestation, claims Mr Assange has denied.
Mr Assange sought refuge in Ecuador's embassy in Britain in June 2012 after having exhausted all legal options at British courts to avoid being extradited to Sweden.
He has said he fears that being sent to Sweden would be a pretext for transferring him to the United States, where WikiLeaks sparked an uproar with its publication of thousands of secret documents.
WikiLeaks repeatedly drove the global news agenda with startling revelations of the behind-the-scenes activities of governments around the world.
From confidential assessments by US diplomats of Chinese leaders to revised body counts in Iraq, the WikiLeaks documents provided the public with an unprecedented look under the hood of international politics.
- 'Strong arguments' -
Mr Assange's legal team has argued that Swedish prosecutors have dragged out the case for an unreasonably long period by not interviewing him at the embassy.
"We are confident about the hearing," Mr Assange's lawyer Mr Olsson told AFP Tuesday. "We think we have very strong arguments for the court to overrule the original decision."
Camilla Murray, chief administrator at the court, said a decision in favour of Mr Assange would mean that a European arrest warrant against him will be immediately cancelled.
"The charges will not be dropped just because the court cancels the arrest warrant. But I cannot answer for the prosecutors and what they will do. They are the ones leading the investigation," she told AFP.
Mr Assange has acknowledged that even if the Swedish prosecutors decide to drop the case, it is only one part of the legal battle that keeps him marooned at the embassy.
"I still have the larger problem, which is that of the United States and its pending prosecution, and perhaps extradition warrant," he told reporters in a conference call in June.
Mr Olsson, his lawyer, was also cautious about stating what will happen if the court repeals the warrant.
"What he will do when that occurs is up to Julian Assange. We're going to have a hearing... and we hope to get a decision overruling (the warrant) and then we will take it from there."
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world
