New York: Social network giant Twitter has banned onsite blood drives in its offices worldwide where regulations do not permit blood donations from gay or bisexual men, a move that LGBT-rights advocates say is a first for a public technology company.
The San Francisco-based company made the decision after one of its US employees, a gay man, was turned away from donating blood at the company's headquarters, a spokeswoman said on Monday.
Blood donations from gay men have been barred since the discovery that HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, could be transmitted through transfusions.
Currently in the United States, under a policy by the federal Food and Drug Administration (FDA) that is more than three decades old, men who have sex with other men cannot donate blood.
That rule is being reevaluated, with the agency recommending in draft guidance in May that gay men be allowed to donate blood a year after their last sexual contact.
Twitter employee Jim Halloran, who heads TwitterOpen, the company's employee resource group for workers who are lesbian, gay, bisexual or transgender, criticized the potential partial lifting of the ban as insufficient.
"This is again just a lesser form of discrimination based on a person's identity," Halloran said.
Twitter has urged the FDA to lift its restrictions on blood donations from gay men and instead to base its regulations on sexual behavior, not orientation, according to a letter the company sent to the federal agency in July.
The FDA declined to comment.
Twitter has some 2,300 employees at its headquarters and nearly twice as many globally, in countries from China to Ireland.
So far, its onsite blood drives have primarily been held at its headquarters in San Francisco, the spokeswoman said. A blood drive was held at its New York offices last year, she said.
At the LGBT rights advocacy group Human Rights Campaign's office in Washington, D.C., Government Affairs Director David Stacy hailed Twitter's stance.
"With the current ample supply of blood in the United States, it makes sense for an organization like Twitter to help raise awareness of how the current policy is needlessly discriminatory and based on stereotypes rather than risky behavior," he said.
Separately, a spokesman for the Human Rights Campaign said Twitter's move was believed to be a first for a public tech company.
Earlier this month, France announced that next year it will lift a lifetime ban on gay men donating blood, which had been in place since 1983.
In April, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that banning homosexual men from giving blood may be justified where strictly necessary and only if there are no alternatives for preventing the transmission of severe infectious diseases.
The San Francisco-based company made the decision after one of its US employees, a gay man, was turned away from donating blood at the company's headquarters, a spokeswoman said on Monday.
Blood donations from gay men have been barred since the discovery that HIV, the virus that causes AIDS, could be transmitted through transfusions.
That rule is being reevaluated, with the agency recommending in draft guidance in May that gay men be allowed to donate blood a year after their last sexual contact.
Advertisement
"This is again just a lesser form of discrimination based on a person's identity," Halloran said.
Advertisement
The FDA declined to comment.
Advertisement
So far, its onsite blood drives have primarily been held at its headquarters in San Francisco, the spokeswoman said. A blood drive was held at its New York offices last year, she said.
Advertisement
"With the current ample supply of blood in the United States, it makes sense for an organization like Twitter to help raise awareness of how the current policy is needlessly discriminatory and based on stereotypes rather than risky behavior," he said.
Advertisement
Earlier this month, France announced that next year it will lift a lifetime ban on gay men donating blood, which had been in place since 1983.
In April, the Court of Justice of the European Union ruled that banning homosexual men from giving blood may be justified where strictly necessary and only if there are no alternatives for preventing the transmission of severe infectious diseases.
© Thomson Reuters 2015
COMMENTS
Advertisement
Opinion: Opinion | Imane Khelif, And The Scourge Of 'Transvestigators' Musk's X Ordered To Pay Rs 5 Crore To Employee Fired For Not Responding To Billionaire's Email Elon Musk's X Sued for $20 Million in Shares by Ex-Twitter Chairman Trinamool MP Summoned By Cops Over "Sniffer Dog" Claim In Rape-Murder Probe "Here For Personal Work": Hemant Soren Aide In Delhi Amid Switchover Buzz Indian-Origin Family, On Way To Daughter's College, Killed In US Car Crash CBI Begins Psychological Test Of Kolkata Rape-Murder Accused Trinamool MP Summoned By Cops Over "Sniffer Dog" Claim In Rape-Murder Probe Kareena Kapoor's "Saturday Night Date" Features This Dreamy Dessert - See Pic Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.