In the April 17, 2014, photo plaintiffs challenging Oklahoma's gay marriage ban Sharon Baldwin, left, and her partner Mary Bishop leave court following a hearing.
Oklahoma City:
A US federal appeals court ruled Friday that Oklahoma must allow gay couples to wed, prompting a fast, angry response from leaders of a conservative state that has vehemently fought policy changes brought on from outside its borders.
A three-judge panel of the 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver upheld a federal judge's ruling striking down Oklahoma's gay marriage ban, which had been approved by more than 75 percent of voters in 2004.
The court put its 2-1 ruling on hold pending an appeal, meaning same-sex couples won't be allowed to marry in Oklahoma for now.
"Today's ruling is another instance of federal courts ignoring the will of the people and trampling on the right of states to govern themselves," Gov. Mary Fallin said. "In this case, two judges have acted to overturn a law supported by Oklahomans."
She said she hoped the decision was overturned and pledged to "fight back against our federal government when it seeks to ignore or change laws written and supported by Oklahomans."
Friday's decision marks the second time the federal appeals court has found the U.S. Constitution protects same-sex marriage.
In June, the same three-judge panel ruled that Utah's ban on same-sex marriage violates the Constitution, a decision that is also on hold. That was the first time an appellate court determined that the U.S. Supreme Court's decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act meant states couldn't deny gays the ability to wed.
In its landmark ruling, the Supreme Court ordered the federal government to recognize state-sanctioned marriages but it stopped short of declaring same-sex marriages legal nationwide. Since then, however, state gay marriage bans have been falling around the country. Gay and lesbian couples can now marry in 19 states and Washington, D.C.
On Friday, Colorado's state Supreme Court ordered Denver's clerk to stop issuing marriage licenses to gay couples while that state's ban against the unions remains in place. The clerk was one of three in the state who began issuing the licenses recently. The ruling noted that the judge who ruled the ban unconstitutional stayed his decision pending appeal.
Sharon Baldwin and Mary Bishop filed the Oklahoma lawsuit in 2004 shortly after 76 percent of Oklahoma voters approved a constitutional ban on gay marriage. After an appeals court ruled in 2009 that the couple lacked standing, they filed an amended complaint listing as the defendant the Tulsa County Court Clerk, since that is the person who issues marriage licenses.
A second claim, by Gay Phillips and Susan Barton, who had a civil union in Vermont and were legally wed in Canada, challenges a section of the Defense of Marriage Act that says individual states don't have to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other jurisdictions.
"We are so grateful that the 10th Circuit understands what more and more people across this country are beginning to realize - that gay and lesbian people are citizens who should enjoy the same rights as straight people under the law," Baldwin and Bishop said in a statement.
Attorneys representing the clerk said they were considering their options. They noted the panel's dissenting judge argued that changing the definition of marriage should belong to Oklahoma residents, not a federal court.
"Every child deserves a mom and a dad, and the people of Oklahoma confirmed that at the ballot box when they approved a constitutional amendment that affirmed marriage as a man-woman union," said Byron Babione, senior attorney for the Alliance Defending Freedom, which is defending the county clerk.
A three-judge panel of the 10th US Circuit Court of Appeals in Denver upheld a federal judge's ruling striking down Oklahoma's gay marriage ban, which had been approved by more than 75 percent of voters in 2004.
The court put its 2-1 ruling on hold pending an appeal, meaning same-sex couples won't be allowed to marry in Oklahoma for now.
"Today's ruling is another instance of federal courts ignoring the will of the people and trampling on the right of states to govern themselves," Gov. Mary Fallin said. "In this case, two judges have acted to overturn a law supported by Oklahomans."
She said she hoped the decision was overturned and pledged to "fight back against our federal government when it seeks to ignore or change laws written and supported by Oklahomans."
Friday's decision marks the second time the federal appeals court has found the U.S. Constitution protects same-sex marriage.
In June, the same three-judge panel ruled that Utah's ban on same-sex marriage violates the Constitution, a decision that is also on hold. That was the first time an appellate court determined that the U.S. Supreme Court's decision striking down the Defense of Marriage Act meant states couldn't deny gays the ability to wed.
In its landmark ruling, the Supreme Court ordered the federal government to recognize state-sanctioned marriages but it stopped short of declaring same-sex marriages legal nationwide. Since then, however, state gay marriage bans have been falling around the country. Gay and lesbian couples can now marry in 19 states and Washington, D.C.
On Friday, Colorado's state Supreme Court ordered Denver's clerk to stop issuing marriage licenses to gay couples while that state's ban against the unions remains in place. The clerk was one of three in the state who began issuing the licenses recently. The ruling noted that the judge who ruled the ban unconstitutional stayed his decision pending appeal.
Sharon Baldwin and Mary Bishop filed the Oklahoma lawsuit in 2004 shortly after 76 percent of Oklahoma voters approved a constitutional ban on gay marriage. After an appeals court ruled in 2009 that the couple lacked standing, they filed an amended complaint listing as the defendant the Tulsa County Court Clerk, since that is the person who issues marriage licenses.
A second claim, by Gay Phillips and Susan Barton, who had a civil union in Vermont and were legally wed in Canada, challenges a section of the Defense of Marriage Act that says individual states don't have to recognize same-sex marriages performed in other jurisdictions.
"We are so grateful that the 10th Circuit understands what more and more people across this country are beginning to realize - that gay and lesbian people are citizens who should enjoy the same rights as straight people under the law," Baldwin and Bishop said in a statement.
Attorneys representing the clerk said they were considering their options. They noted the panel's dissenting judge argued that changing the definition of marriage should belong to Oklahoma residents, not a federal court.
"Every child deserves a mom and a dad, and the people of Oklahoma confirmed that at the ballot box when they approved a constitutional amendment that affirmed marriage as a man-woman union," said Byron Babione, senior attorney for the Alliance Defending Freedom, which is defending the county clerk.
Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world
