Los Angeles, United States: An American judge whose impartiality was questioned by Donald Trump because of his Hispanic origins on Tuesday rejected a legal challenge to the president's planned wall on the Mexican border.
The state of California and various environmental group had argued that waivers to environmental regulations, which were granted so construction of border wall prototypes and the replacement of existing border fencing could proceed, exceeded authority granted by Congress, were unconstitutional, or both.
Gonzalo Curiel ruled in favor of the US government, but also made clear that the decision was separate from the underlying issue of whether or not the wall the cost of which could run into the tens of billions of dollars should be built.
"Court is aware that the subject of these lawsuits, border barriers, is currently the subject of heated political debate in and between the United States and the Republic of Mexico as to the need, efficacy and the source of funding for such barriers," he wrote.
"In its review of this case, the Court cannot and does not consider whether underlying decisions to construct the border barriers are politically wise or prudent."
Trump took to Twitter to hail the ruling, terming it a "big legal win."
"Now this important project can go forward!" he tweeted.
During his 2016 campaign for the presidency, Trump took aim at Curiel's Mexican heritage, saying it should disqualify him from ruling on a fraud lawsuit involving the now-defunct Trump University.
"He's a Mexican," Trump said of Curiel, who was born and raised in the United States. "We're building a wall between here and Mexico.
"I have a Mexican judge. He's of Mexican heritage. He should have recused himself, not only for that, for other things," Trump said.
Building a wall on the border with Mexico was one of Trump's main campaign promises.
But while the president said that Mexico would pay for its construction, it seems increasingly likely that American taxpayers will be footing the bill.
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
The state of California and various environmental group had argued that waivers to environmental regulations, which were granted so construction of border wall prototypes and the replacement of existing border fencing could proceed, exceeded authority granted by Congress, were unconstitutional, or both.
Gonzalo Curiel ruled in favor of the US government, but also made clear that the decision was separate from the underlying issue of whether or not the wall the cost of which could run into the tens of billions of dollars should be built.
"In its review of this case, the Court cannot and does not consider whether underlying decisions to construct the border barriers are politically wise or prudent."
Advertisement
"Now this important project can go forward!" he tweeted.
Advertisement
"He's a Mexican," Trump said of Curiel, who was born and raised in the United States. "We're building a wall between here and Mexico.
Advertisement
Building a wall on the border with Mexico was one of Trump's main campaign promises.
Advertisement
(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)
COMMENTS
Advertisement
Donald Trump Agrees To Debate Kamala Harris On September 4 US Got Intel About Iranian Plot To Kill Trump Weeks Before Rally Shooting Biden Denies Reports Of 8 pm Bedtime, But Says He Needs To Pace Himself Video: Woman Tries To Jump Off Mumbai's Atal Setu, Saved By Driver, Cops Parents Gave Names Of Interns, Doctors To CBI In Kolkata Horror: Sources Pak-Origin Man, Involved In 26/11 Attack, Extraditable To India: US Court Mahindra Thar Roxx Review: Potential Compact SUV Challenger Cloudburst In Himachal Pradesh's Rampur, Road Washed Away How This Modest Indian Snack Became A Worldwide Superfood Track Latest News Live on NDTV.com and get news updates from India and around the world.