Why China Lost Its Claim To South China Sea

Advertisement
Read Time: 2 mins
China laid claimed to 85 per cent of the South China Sea before this ruling. (File Photo)
Hong Kong: A five judge tribunal at the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague today issued their award in a suit brought by the Philippines disputing Chinese actions in the South China Sea.

Here are some key elements from today's ruling:
  • That China has no "historic title" over the waters of the South China Sea.
  • Specifically, that the 1982 UN Convention on the Law of the Sea supercedes China's "Nine-dash line"- its 69-year-old claim to roughly 85 percent of the South China Sea.
  • That none of the features of the Spratly Islands off the Philippines' west coast give China any right to an exclusive economic zone. 
  • That China has interfered with traditional Philippines fishing rights, notably at Scarborough Shoal.
  • That Chinese oil exploration near Reed Bank violated the Philippines' sovereign rights.
  • That China damaged parts of the ecosystem of the Spratly Islands with activities such as overfishing and creating artificial islands.
  • That China's actions have aggravated its conflict with the Philippines at a time it was meant to be resolving them.
 
© Thomson Reuters 2016
Topics mentioned in this article