"Logic Of A Bandit": China Slams US TikTok Vote

On Wednesday, the US House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved a bill that would force TikTok to divest from its parent company or face a nationwide ban.

Advertisement
Read Time: 3 mins
China slammed the approval of a US bill that might lead to a ban on TikTok (Representational)
Beijing:

China on Thursday slammed the approval of a US bill that would ban TikTok unless it severs ties with its Chinese parent company, blasting Washington's "bandit" mentality and vowing Beijing would "take all necessary measures" to protect the interests of its companies overseas.

The short-video app has soared in popularity worldwide but its ownership by Chinese technology giant ByteDance -- and alleged subservience to Beijing's ruling Communist Party -- has fuelled concern in Western capitals.

On Wednesday, the US House of Representatives overwhelmingly approved a bill that would force TikTok to divest from its parent company or face a nationwide ban.

The bill is yet to pass the Senate, where it is expected to face a tougher test to become law.

"The US should truly respect the principles of a market economy and fair competition (and) stop unjustly suppressing foreign companies," Beijing's commerce ministry spokesperson He Yadong said at a press conference on Thursday afternoon.

Washington should also "provide an open, fair, just, and non-discriminatory environment for foreign companies to invest and operate in the US", He added.

"China will take all necessary measures to resolutely safeguard its legitimate rights and interests," he said.

"Logic Of A Bandit"

At a separate press briefing on Thursday, Beijing's foreign ministry spokesperson Wang Wenbin said the vote "runs contrary to the principles of fair competition and international economic and trade rules".

"If so-called reasons of national security can be used to arbitrarily suppress excellent companies from other countries, then there is no fairness and justice at all," Wang said.

"When someone sees a good thing another person has and tries to take it for themselves, this is entirely the logic of a bandit."

Before the vote, Beijing had warned that the proposed ban would "inevitably come back to bite the United States".

US lawmakers voted 352 in favour of the proposed law and 65 against it, striking a rare note of unity in politically divided Washington.

Advertisement

The White House has said President Joe Biden will sign the bill - known officially as the Protecting Americans from Foreign Adversary Controlled Applications Act - into law if it reaches his desk.

But it faces a tricky path through the more cautious Senate, where some are wary of taking dramatic measures against an app with 170 million US users.

Advertisement

TikTok has consistently denied that it is under the control of China's Communist Party.

Its CEO Shou Zi Chew has urged users to speak out against the vote, and several TikTok creators interviewed by AFP voiced opposition to the proposed ban.

Long-Running Tensions

The app is at the centre of long-running tensions between China and the United States, which have butted heads in recent years over technology, trade, and human rights issues.

Advertisement

Washington has cited national security concerns to limit the activities of some Chinese companies in the United States, as well as the export of certain technologies to China that it deems sensitive.

Beijing has repeatedly lashed out at what it views as a concerted attempt to "suppress" China's rise.

Foreign minister Wang Yi said this month that Washington's "desire to heap blame under any pretext has reached an unbelievable level".

Advertisement

"The methods used to suppress China are constantly being renewed, and the list of unilateral sanctions is constantly being extended," Wang said at a press briefing during annual political meetings in Beijing.

(Except for the headline, this story has not been edited by NDTV staff and is published from a syndicated feed.)

Featured Video Of The Day
AAP Announces Door-To-Door Registration Drive For 2 New Welfare Schemes
Topics mentioned in this article